2025 : 4 : 22
Farhad seraji

Farhad seraji

Academic rank: Professor
ORCID:
Education: PhD.
ScopusId:
HIndex:
Faculty: Faculty of Humanities
Address:
Phone: 08134225331

Research

Title
Identifying the Weaknesses of Formative Assessment in the e-Learning Management System
Type
JournalPaper
Keywords
Weaknesses, Formative Assessment, Learning Management System, e-Learning, Shahid Beheshti University
Year
2020
Journal Journal of medical education
DOI
Researchers Hamed Abbasi Kasani ، Gholamreza Shamsemorkani ، Farhad seraji ، Hojjat Abedi

Abstract

Background: Assessment is one of the most important elements of any educational system, including the e-learning. Formative assessment is also a significant type of assessment, which plays a very important role in identifying students’ strengths and weaknesses and helping to improve learning in the e-learning system. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify weaknesses of formative assessment in the e-learning management systemof Iran (case study: Shahid Beheshti University). Methods: The present studywasqualitative research. The participants of the study consisted of the students of the e-learning Center of Shahid Beheshti University of Iran, 15 of whom were selected using a purposive sampling method. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. Content analysis was also used to analyze the data. Results: Formative assessment in the e-learning management system of Shahid Beheshti University suffers from eleven substantial weaknesses: weakness in technology infrastructure resources, not using other formative assessment tools, weakness in giving and receiving feedback, inability to authenticate, weakness in class presentations, weakness in exercises and projects, weakness in online tests, weakness in discussions, inattention to formative assessment, restrictions on uploading assignments and activities, and observance of the ratio of teachers to students. Conclusions: The above weaknesses should be taken into consideration for the improvement of formative assessment, student learning, and the status quo.