The title paper contains two types of calculations that are in disagreement with some basic concepts of chemistry. The first one is calculating a macroscopic amount of energy difference between one pair of enantiomers that is not correct. The second one is that the different bond orders for R and S stereoisomers and for different pathways of hyperconjugation/electron delocalization have been reported that both are impossible. In addition, the term electron transfer has been wrongly used for donor-acceptor orbital interactions inside one molecule where nothing is oxidized or reduced. Furthermore, the paper has missed some necessary comparisons with a previously published work of authors. There are also some technical problems in the title paper that are discussed in the present comment article.
